The Commission has recently added to the existing guidance, with separate guidance highlighting situations in which charities should report incidents involving partners, such as trading subsidiaries, delivery partners, or other organisations that receive funding from the charity.
This guidance seeks to set out the considerations of charities which experience serious incidents involving partners, starting by dividing such incidents into three different types:
- incidents involving the charity’s funds, brand, people, or an activity that it either funds or is responsible for
- incidents not involving the charity’s funds, brand or people, but could have a significant impact on the charity, and
- incidents not involving the charity’s funds, brand or people, and have little or no impact on the charity.
The guidance states that the first of these is most likely to trigger the reporting requirement to the Commission, because of the higher risks resulting from the close links between the charity and the incident. The second category is less likely to trigger the reporting requirement but may still need reporting in some circumstances such as where, for example, the incident causes or is likely to cause “material reputational damage” to the charity. The guidance suggests that the third category would not normally trigger the reporting requirement.
However, the guidance is very clear that whether reporting is required for any category of serious incident involving a partner is still a question of context, and the charity trustees will have to make a decision taking into account the specific facts of the incident, the actual or likely impact on the charity, and the risk to the charity.
For this reason, although the new guidance is to welcomed, because it should help charities facing the question as to whether they should report an incident involving a partner organisation easily to locate the Commission’s guidance for such situations, charity trustees will see that the new guidance does not make their job significantly easier – the onus is still very much on them to consider all the relevant factors before coming to a decision on whether an incident is, in fact, reportable.